Donations to the Community of Sant'Egidio are tax deductible
under current regulations

Also this year it can target the 5x1000 to the Community of Sant'Egidio
Write the number 80191770587 in the tax return

Andrea Riccardi: on the web

Andrea Riccardi: on social networks

Andrea Riccardi: press review

change language
sei in: no death penalty - news newslettercontact uslink

Sostieni la Comunità

 
November 5 2008 | TAIWAN

Taiwan

Minister of Juztice, Mrs. Wang Ching Feng, declares she's firmly against death penalty

 
versione stampabile

Taipei Times

Minister of Juztice, Mrs. Wang Ching Feng, declares she's firmly against death penalty

Yesterday, as Indonesia increased security ahead of the execution of the three Islamic militants convicted in the 2002 Bali bombings, a seminar in Taipei brought French and Taiwanese legal specialists together to discuss how Taiwan can continue its path toward abolishing capital punishment.

The carnage wrought by the terrorists behind the bombings, in which 202 people were killed, was an unspeakable crime.

It may seem difficult in this context to argue for the abolition of the death penalty, but the message at yesterday’s forum was clear: The death penalty is a violation of human rights, illegal in all cases under international law.

Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (???) yesterday attended the forum, which she described as her “duty.”

Wang has repeatedly stated her opposition to the death penalty. She is the third in a line of ministers of justice who have spoken out against capital punishment, making it clear that Taiwan should take the path of the majority of countries that have abolished the penalty in law or in practice.

In the case of the Bali bombers, the uselessness of the death penalty is crystal-clear: No penalty can make reparations for the massive loss of innocent lives that has and will continue to torment the family members of the victims.

Meanwhile, it is unlikely that the executions will deter similar crimes, which is one of the most often cited — and often disproved — arguments for capital punishment. On the contrary, the bombers have not repented and see themselves as martyrs, while the Indonesian government is bracing for potential retribution attacks by terrorist networks. The Australian and US embassies, meanwhile, have received bomb threats.

In this case, the death penalty serves no helpful purpose to society and may even increase the wrath of extremists who have no qualms about taking innocent lives.

At yesterday’s forum, a man stood up and told the speakers: “We want real human rights, not fake human rights.”

When a terrible crime is committed, killing the perpetrator amounts to respecting the rights of the victim, he argued.

His opinion reflects one of two main obstacles to moving public opinion in Taiwan and other retentionist countries: the belief that vengeance and justice are one and the same. In a modern justice system, however, revenge has no place.

The other barrier is the belief that the death penalty is necessary for public safety, a claim that collapses under scrutiny.

With the government repeatedly arguing that winning over public support is crucial to abolishing the death penalty, these are the deeply entrenched attitudes that Wang will have to tackle.

The experiences of countries like France, which abolished capital punishment long ago, have a definite role to play in revealing misconceptions about capital punishment.

Although it is unlikely that Taiwan will see legislation any time soon abolishing the death penalty, the Ministry of Justice can, like dozens of other retentionist countries, choose not to execute any of the prisoners on death row.

Taiwan’s last execution was in 2005. In the meantime, interested parties should take an aggressive stance on the issue, educating prosecutors and the public, tackling problems with the judicial process and challenging the assumption that an eye for an eye amounts to justice.

NEWS CORRELATE
November 14 2018
NEW YORK, UNITED STATES

Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian, Cultural) Approves Death Penalty Moratorium


Approved as amended by a recorded vote of 123 in favour to 36 against, with 30 abstentions
November 3 2018
GERMANY
The death penalty in Germany was canceled by the judiciary of the Federal Republic in 1949, while in the Democratic Republic it was abolished in 1987

The German state of Hesse has voted to finally scrap the death penalty from its constitution

October 12 2018
UNITED STATES
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP)

Washington state ends 'racially biased' death penalty


Washington's Supreme Court unanimously struck down the state's death penalty Thursday as arbitrary and racially biased, making it the 20th state to do away with capital punishment.
October 10 2018
RUSSIA

Belarusian Orthodox church supports moratorium on death penalty

October 10 2018
by dp.Spring96

Treatment of death row prisoners in Belarus


While on death row, convicts face a number of violations of their rights. During their one monthly visit with a family member, they are forbidden from referring to detention conditions
September 27 2018
UNITED STATES
We thank all those who believed in human justice and who chose to respect life

Texas Executes Troy Clark on September 26, 2018, he was 51 years old


The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles had rejected a request for clemency from Troy Clark.
tutte le news correlate

RASSEGNA STAMPA CORRELATA
November 28 2016
AP

High court to examine mental disability, death penalty issue
November 12 2016
Internazionale

Si rafforza la pena di morte negli Stati Uniti
November 11 2016

Al liceo classico “Socrate” di Bari, conferenza “Non c’è giustizia senza vita”
October 24 2016
New York Times

The Death Penalty, Nearing Its End
June 4 2016
The Washington Post

Meet the red-state conservatives fighting to abolish the death penalty
tutta la rassegna stampa correlata

VIDEO FOTO
53
Video promo Cities for Life 2015
3:22

99 visite

246 visite

61 visite

72 visite

77 visite
tutta i media correlati