Donations to the Community of Sant'Egidio are tax deductible
under current regulations

Also this year it can target the 5x1000 to the Community of Sant'Egidio
Write the number 80191770587 in the tax return

Andrea Riccardi: on the web

Andrea Riccardi: on social networks

Andrea Riccardi: press review

change language
you are in: no death penalty - news contact usnewsletterlink

Support The Community

 
June 1 2010 | CHINA

China

New rules: accusations and evidences obtained through torture cannot be used in death penalty cases

 
printable version

The Examiner

China issues new rules banning evidence obtained through torture

By: TINI TRAN

BEIJINGChina has issued new rules saying evidence obtained through torture and threats cannot be used in criminal prosecutions and said such evidence would be thrown out in death penalty cases that are under appeal.

The new regulations — posted on the central government's website Sunday — make it clear that evidence with unclear origins, confessions obtained through torture, and testimony acquired through violence and threats are invalid. This is the first time Beijing has explicitly stated that evidence obtained under torture or duress is illegal and inadmissible in court.

"Since the system was not perfect, the standards on reinforcing the law were not unified and the law executors were not equally competent. Problems occurred in the handling of cases and they should not be ignored," according to a statement on the website.

The regulations were released jointly by the Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of State Security and the Ministry of Justice, according to a statement on the website.

Legal experts in China say the new rules constitute major progress in protecting the legal rights of defendants.

One of the regulations pertains to how death penalty cases should be reviewed, including a rule that illegally obtained evidence should be invalid.

A second rule sets out guidelines on how evidence should be obtained in criminal cases, which explicitly bans the use of force or intimidation on defendants and witnesses.

"The issue of illegally obtained evidence has long been a controversial one in China and now they made a big step forward in this respect," said Fan Yu, a law professor at Renmin University Law School who specializes in the judicial system.

The rulings are especially important for death penalty cases, where a flawed system has led to the deaths of several criminal suspects by torture in detention centers.

"Death sentences are irreversible. Any tiny mistake could cost people's lives," she said. "There's serious lesson to be drawn from those cases."

China executes more people annually than any country in the world, though it does not release an official count. Rights group Amnesty International estimated China put at least 1,718 people to death in 2008.

In 2008, China's top court said about 15 percent of death sentence verdicts by lower courts were found to have problems, the China Daily newspaper reported Monday.

The frequent use of torture by police to obtain confessions was highlighted earlier this month in the case of Zhao Zuohai, a man who spent 11 years in jail after being beaten into confessing the murder of a man who wasn't even dead.

After the man he supposedly killed returned to their hometown in central Henan province, Zhao, 57, was freed and given $96,000 in government compensation. After his release, Zhao said he was forced to confess because police beat him during interrogations and deprived him of sleep for days.

The case put an embarrassing spotlight on China's often corrupt justice system. Three police officers accused of torturing Zhao have been arrested, while the chief justice who presided over the case was suspended pending further investigation.

RELATED NEWS
November 2 2017
article by Andrea Riccardi

Death Penalty: Horror or Injustice


(Famiglia cristiana) translated in English
October 27 2017
UNITED STATES
From SOUTHERN CROSS - CATHOLIC PASTORAL CENTER

Three bishops reiterate their opposition to the death penalty following resolution of court case


Barbara D. King is the Director of Communications for the diocese of Savannah
October 27 2017
GUATEMALA

Guatemala high court abolishes death penalty in civil cases

October 18 2017

Back from Death Row: Working to End Capital Punishment

October 16 2017
UNITED STATES

U.N. Secretary-General, European Union Ambassador Call for Abolition of “Barbaric” Death Penalty

October 12 2017
VATICAN CITY, VATICAN CITY

Pope Francis calls for end to death penalty: '' it's against the Gospel''


"because it is voluntarily decided to suppress a human life that is always holy in the eyes of the Creator"
all related news

ASSOCIATED PRESS
November 28 2016
AP

High court to examine mental disability, death penalty issue
November 12 2016
Internazionale

Si rafforza la pena di morte negli Stati Uniti
November 11 2016

Al liceo classico “Socrate” di Bari, conferenza “Non c’è giustizia senza vita”
October 24 2016
New York Times

The Death Penalty, Nearing Its End
June 4 2016
The Washington Post

Meet the red-state conservatives fighting to abolish the death penalty
all press-related

VIDEO PHOTOS
53
Video promo Cities for Life 2015
3:22

81 visits

239 visits

54 visits

63 visits

71 visits
all the related media