Le donazioni alla Comunità di Sant'Egidio sono fiscalmente deducibili
secondo la normativa vigente
 
Anche quest'anno è possibile destinare il 5x1000 alla Comunità di Sant'Egidio
Scrivi il numero 80191770587 nella dichiarazione dei redditi

Andrea Riccardi: sul web

Andrea Riccardi: sui social network

Andrea Riccardi: la rassegna stampa

change language
sei dentro: no pena di morte - news newslettercontattilink

Sostieni la Comunità

 
1 Giugno 2009 | STATI UNITI

Georgia/USA

Troy Davis rischia l'esecuzione senza poter dimostrare la propria innocenza. "Un caso contro la Costituzione degli Stati Uniti"

 
versione stampabile

The New York Times

Death Penalty Disgrace

By BOB BARR

THERE is no abuse of government power more egregious than executing an innocent man. But that is exactly what may happen if the United States Supreme Court fails to intervene on behalf of Troy Davis.

Mr. Davis is facing execution for the 1989 murder of an off-duty police officer in Savannah, Ga., even though seven of the nine witnesses have recanted their testimony against him. Many of these witnesses now say they were pressured into testifying falsely against him by police officers who were understandably eager to convict someone for killing a comrade. No court has ever heard the evidence of Mr. Davis’s innocence.

After the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit barred Mr. Davis from raising his claims of innocence, his attorneys last month petitioned the Supreme Court for an original writ of habeas corpus. This would be an extraordinary procedure — provided for by the Constitution but granted only a handful of times since 1900. However, absent this, Mr. Davis faces an extraordinary and obviously final injustice.

This threat of injustice has come about because the lower courts have misread the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a law I helped write when I was in Congress. As a member of the House Judiciary Committee in the 1990s, I wanted to stop the unfounded and abusive delays in capital cases that tend to undermine our criminal justice system.

With the effective death penalty act, Congress limited the number of habeas corpus petitions that a defendant could file, and set a time after which those petitions could no longer be filed. But nothing in the statute should have left the courts with the impression that they were barred from hearing claims of actual innocence like Troy Davis’s.

It would seem in everyone’s interest to find out as best we can what really happened that night 20 years ago in a dim parking lot where Officer Mark MacPhail was shot dead. With no murder weapon, surveillance videotape or DNA evidence left behind, the jury that judged Mr. Davis had to weigh the conflicting testimony of several eyewitnesses to sift out the gunman from the onlookers who had nothing to do with the heinous crime.

A litany of affidavits from prosecution witnesses now tell of an investigation that was focused not on scrutinizing all suspects, but on building a case against Mr. Davis. One witness, for instance, has said she testified against Mr. Davis because she was on parole and was afraid the police would send her back to prison if she did not cooperate.

So far, the federal courts have said it is enough that the state courts reviewed the affidavits of the witnesses who recanted their testimony. This reasoning is misplaced in a capital case. Reading an affidavit is a far cry from seeing a witness testify in open court.

Because Mr. Davis’s claim of innocence has never been heard in a court, the Supreme Court should remand his case to a federal district court and order an evidentiary hearing. (I was among those who signed an amicus brief in support of Mr. Davis.) Only a hearing where witnesses are subject to cross-examination will put this case to rest.

Although the Supreme Court issued a stay of execution last fall, the court declined to review the case itself, and its intervention still has not provided an opportunity for Mr. Davis to have a hearing on new evidence. This has become a matter of no small urgency: Georgia could set an execution date at any time.

I am a firm believer in the death penalty, but I am an equally firm believer in the rights and protections guaranteed by the Constitution. To execute Troy Davis without having a court hear the evidence of his innocence would be unconscionable and unconstitutional.

Bob Barr served in the House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003 and was the United States attorney for the Northern District of Georgia from 1986 to 1990.

NOTIZIE CORRELATE
27 Novembre 2018
REGNO UNITO
Roma, 28 novembre

IX Incontro internazionale dei ministri della Giustizia per "Un mondo senza pena di morte"


presso la Nuova Aula dei Gruppi parlamentari - Camera dei Deputati
27 Novembre 2018
#STAND4HUMANITY

IL 30 NOVEMBRE AL COLOSSEO: CITTA' PER LA VITA , CONTRO LA PENA DI MORTE


Lato Arco di Costantino ore 18
14 Novembre 2018
NEW YORK, STATI UNITI
La Terza Commissione dell'Assemblea Generale dell'ONU ha approvato la risoluzione per la moratoria con 123 voti a favore

Approvata la risoluzione sulla moratoria della pena di morte con un numero maggiore di consensi rispetto al 2016


Un segnale positivo verso l’obiettivo dell’abolizione completa della pena capitale nel mondo!
3 Novembre 2018
La pena di morte in Germania venne applicata fin dal Medioevo. Fu cancellata dall'ordinamento giudiziario della Repubblica Federale nel 1949, mentre nella Repubblica Democratica fu abolita nel 1987

Germania: lo stato tedesco dell'Assia ha eliminato la pena di morte dalla costituzione che la conservava per un'anomalia giuridica


Con il loro voto i cittadini hanno modificato una norma che da 69 anni conservava la pena di morte
18 Ottobre 2018

Vescovi Usa: plauso per la fine della pena di morte nello Stato di Washington


"Ci uniamo ai vescovi cattolici di Washington, alla Conferenza cattolica dello Stato di Washington, alla rete di mobilitazione cattolica e a tutte le persone di buona volontà nell'accogliere favorevolmente questa decisione e perseverare nel lavoro per porre fine alla pena di morte"
12 Ottobre 2018
STATI UNITI

Lo Stato di Washington ha abolito la pena di morte


La Corte suprema dello Stato di Washington ha stabilito che la pena di morte “viola la Costituzione” e di conseguenza viene abolita
tutte le notizie correlate

RASSEGNA STAMPA CORRELATA
28 Novembre 2016
AP

High court to examine mental disability, death penalty issue
12 Novembre 2016
Internazionale

Si rafforza la pena di morte negli Stati Uniti
11 Novembre 2016

Al liceo classico “Socrate” di Bari, conferenza “Non c’è giustizia senza vita”
24 Ottobre 2016
New York Times

The Death Penalty, Nearing Its End
4 Giugno 2016
The Washington Post

Meet the red-state conservatives fighting to abolish the death penalty
tutta la rassegna stampa correlata

VIDEO FOTO
53
Video promo Cities for Life 2015
3:22

0 visite

0 visite

0 visite

0 visite

0 visite
tutta i media correlati