Le donazioni alla Comunità di Sant'Egidio sono fiscalmente deducibili
secondo la normativa vigente
 
Anche quest'anno è possibile destinare il 5x1000 alla Comunità di Sant'Egidio
Scrivi il numero 80191770587 nella dichiarazione dei redditi

Andrea Riccardi: sul web

Andrea Riccardi: sui social network

Andrea Riccardi: la rassegna stampa

change language
sei dentro: no pena di morte - news newslettercontattilink

Sostieni la Comunità

 
2 Ottobre 2009 | ZAMBIA

Zambia

Henry Kyambalesa: "Necessario pensare a una moratoria"

 
versione stampabile

Lusaka Times

The Death Penalty in Zambia

After reading news articles in both the Times of Zambia and the Zambia Daily Mail on the subject relating to capital punishment in Zambia, and whether or not the National Constitutional Conference (NCC) should adopt the recommendation made by the Mung’omba Constitutional Review Commission on the issue, I have found it necessary to make the following comment:

There are many forms of crime which may at¬tract capital punish¬ment in some countries; they include murder, trea¬son, economic sabotage, and large-scale drug-trafficking. Without sligh¬ting the seriousness of other capital crimes, murder is perhaps the most deserving of the death penalty. A person who willfully takes the life of another person, therefore, commits the ultimate crime – a crime for which the death penalty is a fitting and well-deserved form of punishment.

There are numerous caveats which lend support to such an inf¬lexible stance; let us briefly consider some of these caveats:

1) By killing another person and, therefore, violating the per¬son’s right to life, the murderer dehumanizes himself or herself to the extent that he or she deserves to be expelled from the commu¬nity of living humans.

2) People who commit murder in societies which have corporal puni¬shment already know the consequences associated with such a heinous crime. For such people, the punishment is, therefore, self-inflicted; after all, it is a punishment every societal member can choose to avoid in the first place! Is it not immoral to protect the life of an individual who finds pleasure in committing mur¬ders – the ultimate disregard for other people’s lives?

3) As Ernest van den Haag, a U.S. Professor of Jurispru¬dence and Pub¬lic Policy, has concluded, “The severity and finality of the death penalty is [commensurate with] … the seriousness and the finality of murder.” In short, the death penalty functions as a rea¬sonable and generally accept¬able form of retribution (or appropriate punishment) for murder. The punishment fits the crime, so to speak!

4) The death penalty serves well as a more dreadful deterrent to murder than life imprisonment and, among other things, as an ef¬fective incapaci¬tation of murderers.

5) It would be immoral for the government to collect tax revenue from law-abiding members of society, some of whom are kith and/or kin of murder victi¬ms, and commit it to the protection and upkeep of duly con¬victed murder¬ers sentenced to life imprison¬ment.

6) Prison escapes of hardcore criminals are not uncomm¬on – even in countr¬ies which can afford to provide highly secure prison facilities, such as the United States. There is also the potential for criminals to be released from prison by mistake. On March 26, 2002, for example, Clifton Blecha (a convicted mur¬derer concur¬rently serving a life sentence and a 24-year prison term at Colorado State Penitentiary in Canon city, United Sta¬tes) was mistakenly paroled due to a paperwork mix-up. He was initia¬lly jailed in 1988 on a burglary conviction, and later convicted of murdering a fellow inmate in 1994. (BeDan, M., “Paperwork Mix-Up Frees Mur¬derer,” Rocky Mountain News, May 3, 2002, p. 7A.)

However, the application of capital punishment calls for a fundamen¬tal redress of any apparent inadequacies in a country’s cri¬minal justice system so that the punishment can be admi¬nistered fairly, impartial¬ly, with reaso¬nable consisten¬cy, and upon an objective and exhaus¬tive assess¬ment of circumstanc¬es leading to the commission of mur¬der.

Unfortu¬nately, such expectations cannot easily be met in poor cou¬ntries like Zambia, pseudo democ¬ra¬cies, and totalitarian states world¬wide.

There is, therefore, a need for the Zambian government to constitute an ad hoc panel of local legal experts to determine whether or not the Zambi¬an cri¬minal jus¬tice system meets the foregoing expectations. If it is be found to be wanting, the Republican president and the Zambian Parliament need to seriously con¬sider the pros¬pect of placing a morato¬rium on capital punish¬ment, to com¬mute the prison sentences of any indi¬viduals who are currently on the death row to life impri¬sonment without the possibility of parole, and to decide on modalities for periodic reviews of the moratorium.

Over the years, we have heard calls by some segments of Zambian society for the abolition of the death penalty in the country. I believe a decision on whether or not capital punishment should be abolished in Zambia can only be made by the citizenry through a referendum designed specifically for this purpose, and after exhaustive national debate on the issue, not by the National Constitutional Conference (NCC).

Henry Kyambalesa

NOTIZIE CORRELATE
27 Novembre 2018
REGNO UNITO
Roma, 28 novembre

IX Incontro internazionale dei ministri della Giustizia per "Un mondo senza pena di morte"


presso la Nuova Aula dei Gruppi parlamentari - Camera dei Deputati
27 Novembre 2018
#STAND4HUMANITY

IL 30 NOVEMBRE AL COLOSSEO: CITTA' PER LA VITA , CONTRO LA PENA DI MORTE


Lato Arco di Costantino ore 18
14 Novembre 2018
NEW YORK, STATI UNITI
La Terza Commissione dell'Assemblea Generale dell'ONU ha approvato la risoluzione per la moratoria con 123 voti a favore

Approvata la risoluzione sulla moratoria della pena di morte con un numero maggiore di consensi rispetto al 2016


Un segnale positivo verso l’obiettivo dell’abolizione completa della pena capitale nel mondo!
3 Novembre 2018
La pena di morte in Germania venne applicata fin dal Medioevo. Fu cancellata dall'ordinamento giudiziario della Repubblica Federale nel 1949, mentre nella Repubblica Democratica fu abolita nel 1987

Germania: lo stato tedesco dell'Assia ha eliminato la pena di morte dalla costituzione che la conservava per un'anomalia giuridica


Con il loro voto i cittadini hanno modificato una norma che da 69 anni conservava la pena di morte
18 Ottobre 2018

Vescovi Usa: plauso per la fine della pena di morte nello Stato di Washington


"Ci uniamo ai vescovi cattolici di Washington, alla Conferenza cattolica dello Stato di Washington, alla rete di mobilitazione cattolica e a tutte le persone di buona volontà nell'accogliere favorevolmente questa decisione e perseverare nel lavoro per porre fine alla pena di morte"
12 Ottobre 2018
STATI UNITI

Lo Stato di Washington ha abolito la pena di morte


La Corte suprema dello Stato di Washington ha stabilito che la pena di morte “viola la Costituzione” e di conseguenza viene abolita
tutte le notizie correlate

RASSEGNA STAMPA CORRELATA
28 Novembre 2016
AP

High court to examine mental disability, death penalty issue
12 Novembre 2016
Internazionale

Si rafforza la pena di morte negli Stati Uniti
11 Novembre 2016

Al liceo classico “Socrate” di Bari, conferenza “Non c’è giustizia senza vita”
24 Ottobre 2016
New York Times

The Death Penalty, Nearing Its End
4 Giugno 2016
The Washington Post

Meet the red-state conservatives fighting to abolish the death penalty
tutta la rassegna stampa correlata

VIDEO FOTO
53
Video promo Cities for Life 2015
3:22

0 visite

0 visite

0 visite

0 visite

0 visite
tutta i media correlati