Le donazioni alla Comunità di Sant'Egidio sono fiscalmente deducibili
secondo la normativa vigente
 
Anche quest'anno è possibile destinare il 5x1000 alla Comunità di Sant'Egidio
Scrivi il numero 80191770587 nella dichiarazione dei redditi

Andrea Riccardi: sul web

Andrea Riccardi: sui social network

Andrea Riccardi: la rassegna stampa

change language
sei in: no pena di morte - news contattinewsletterlink

Sostieni la Comunità

 
29 Marzo 2011 | STATI UNITI

USA

Georgia, respinto dalla Corte Suprema il ricorso di Troy Davis. Seri rischi per la sua vita, tanti dubbi sulla sua colpevolezza

 
versione stampabile

Denniston Reporter

Davis innocence plea rejected

The Court turns down, without explanation, all pleas by Georgia death-row inmate Troy Anthony Davis that he is innocent of a 1989 murder of an off-duty policeman.

The Supreme Court, without a noted dissent, on Monday cleared the way for the state of Georgia to carry out the execution of Troy Anthony Davis of Savannah, rejecting five different ways that Davis’s lawyers had sought to press his claim that he did not commit a 1989 murder of an off-duty policeman.   In three brief orders, none of which contained any explanation, the Court brought to a sudden end a two-decades-long campaign to spare Davis’s life, on the theories that most of those who testified against him have recanted and that another man did the killing, and has since admitted it.
Besides turning aside all of Davis’s requests for a new chance to show his innocence, the Court granted review of one new case: a test of whether there is a “minister’s exception” to civil rights laws that protects religious organizations in their workplace policies and, if there is such an exception, whether it bars a discrimination claim by a parochial school teacher who teaches non-religious subjects.  The case of Hosanna Tabor Church v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al. (10-553) will be heard in the Court’s next Term, starting in October.
The Davis case is one of the most highly visible cases amid scores of them in recent years, claiming wrongful convictions, especially in murder cases.  The most unusual fact of the Davis case was that, for the first time in nearly a half-century, the Supreme Court itself explicitly ordered a federal judge to go over the evidence to test Davis’s claim that he did not commit the crime that occurred in the parking lot of a fast-food restaurant and bus station in Savannah on the night of August 19, 1989.
That judge wound up ruling that Davis “is not innocent.”  Because of what that judge and the Eleventh Circuit Court had done later in the case, Davis’s last hope was in the Supreme Court itself.  But, after examining at one Conference the complex array of maneuvers his lawyers had attempted, the Justices simply rejected all of them.  Although no dissents were reported, that does not necessarily mean that all nine Justices agreed with the outcome.   In fact, two of the Justices, Stephen G. Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, had joined in a comment in August 2009 that there was in this case “a substantial risk of putting an innocent man to death.”
The most likely explanation for the result was that at least a majority of the Justices had concluded that they had given Davis what he wanted — a federal court review of his claim — and that the judge’s rejection of that claim was thorough enough to resolve it.   Davis’s lawyers had argued in their various new pleas that the judge, U.S. District Judge William T. Moore, Jr., of Savannah, in his 172-page decision last August, had in fact not considered all of the evidence that would help support a finding of innocence.  A majority of the Court apparently was not persuaded that there was a sufficient flaw in the way Judge Moore approached the case.   After Judge Moore had ruled, the Eleventh Circuit Court concluded that it had no authority to review the case, since the Supreme Court had sent it to Judge Moore, so a return to the Supreme Court was the only open avenue of appeal.
In returning to the Supreme Court, Davis’s attorneys had said they preferred a return of the case to the Eleventh Circuit, contending that it did, in fact, have the authority to review Judge Moore’s opinion.  But, if the Court were unwilling to take that step (advocated in Davis v. Humphrey, 10-949, which the Court did deny Monday), his counsel asked the Justices to review themselves the evidence to support his claim.   In response to that alternative request, the Court on Monday dismissed his appeal, along with a plea for an original habeas writ, and a plea for a common law writ (all put forth in Davis v. Humphrey, 10-950).  Usually, when the Court dismisses a case (which takes at least five votes), it gives a reason; this time, it did not.
As a final rejection, the Court denied Davis’s first original habeas writ — the one that had led the Court, in August of last year, to order the case reviewed in District Court in Savannah.   That plea had remained on the Court’s docket (In re Davis, 08-1443) since the Court’s order giving Davis the further chance to press his evidence.   All told, then, the Court disposed of five separate legal avenues that his lawyers had outlined.
It now appears that state officials in Georgia are free to schedule a new execution date.  Davis was within two hours of being executed in September 2008, when the Supreme Court blocked the state from carrying it out, until the Justices could act on the habeas writ plea in In re Davis.   With Monday’s order denying that plea, the stay of his execution was lifted automatically.
In turning aside all legal requests, the Court bypassed a chance to answer two fundamental questions that the Court has never answered explicitly about convicted individuals’ claims of innocence: one, whether the Constitution bars the execution of an individual who is actually innocent of the crime, and, two, what standard of proof are federal judges to use in judging whether an individual actually is innocent.   In Judge Moore’s decision, he ruled that it would be unconstitutional to execute someone who is actually innocent, but set a fairly tough standard of proof; applying that standard, he found that Davis is not innocent. 
On Monday, that decision became final.

NEWS CORRELATE
2 Maggio 2017
STATI UNITI

Anthony Farina non è più condannato a morte. Non sarà libero, ma non rischia più l'esecuzione


Dal 2012 migliaia di appelli urgenti alle autorità e lettere e cartoline a Anthony hanno sostenuto questo importante cambiamento
29 Aprile 2017
STATI UNITI
Apprendiamo che lo Stato dell'Arkansas ha portato a termine quattro delle esecuzioni previste

L'ultima esecuzione ieri, Kenneth William era un afroamericano di 38 anni

21 Aprile 2017
STATI UNITI

L'Arkansas ha messo a morte uno dei condannati di nome Ledell Lee


E' prima esecuzione dal 2005. La nostra campagna continua con l'invio di appelli e la richiesta di clemenza
15 Aprile 2017
STATI UNITI
Un giudice ha accolto il ricorso dell'azienda produttrice dei farmaci: il prodotto non era stato venduto per questo scopo

Fermate le esecuzioni in Arkansas in seguito all'esposto di un'azienda farmaceutica


Il provvedimento è temporaneo, continuiamo a inviare appelli!
7 Aprile 2017
STATI UNITI

La lotta e le speranze di fermare le esecuzioni in Arkansas


Anche alcune ex guardie carcerarie hanno scritto al governatore, preoccupate per i pesantissimi effetti psicologici sui loro colleghi
3 Marzo 2017
CITTÀ DEL VATICANO, CITTÀ DEL VATICANO

Il Vaticano all' Onu ribadisce il suo no alla pena di morte, non si fa giustizia uccidendo


L'intervento di Mons. Jurkovic a Ginevra
tutte le news correlate

RASSEGNA STAMPA CORRELATA
28 Novembre 2016
AP

High court to examine mental disability, death penalty issue
12 Novembre 2016
Internazionale

Si rafforza la pena di morte negli Stati Uniti
11 Novembre 2016

Al liceo classico “Socrate” di Bari, conferenza “Non c’è giustizia senza vita”
24 Ottobre 2016
New York Times

The Death Penalty, Nearing Its End
4 Giugno 2016
The Washington Post

Meet the red-state conservatives fighting to abolish the death penalty
tutta la rassegna stampa correlata

VIDEO FOTO
53
Video promo Cities for Life 2015
3:22

11 visite

4 visite

6 visite

5 visite

6 visite
tutta i media correlati